Studia Paedagogica (4/2019)
Fabrizio Macagno, Chrysi Rapanta: The Dimensions of Argumentative Texts and Their Assessment
● Chrysi Rapanta: Bewilderment as a Pragmatic Ingredient of Teacher-Student Dialogic Interactions
● Alina Reznitskaya, Ian A. G. Wilkinson: Measuring Production and Comprehension of Written Arguments in Upper-Elementary Grades
● Dorothee Gronostay: Are Classroom Discussions on Controversial Political Issues in Civic Education Lessons Cognitively Challenging? A Closer Look at Discussions with Assigned Positions
● Na’ama Y. Av-Shalom, Randi M. Zimmerman, Clark A. Chinn, Ravit G. Duncan: Analysis of Different Categories of Epistemic and Metacognitive Discourse in Argumentation
● Stuart Mcnaughton, Tong Zhu, Naomi Rosedale, Jacinta Oldehaver, Rebecca Jesson, Cynthia Greenleaf: Critical Perspective Taking: Promoting and Assessing Online Written Argumentation for Dialogic Focus
● Roman Švaříček: The Role of the Teacher in Supporting Students’ Epistemic Thinking in Dialogic Argumentation. A Case Study
● Joe Oyler: Exploring Teacher Contributions to Student Argumentation Quality
● Markus Hähkiöniemi, Sami Lehesvuori, Pasi Nieminen, Jenna Hiltunen, Kaisa Jokiranta: Three Dimensions of Dialogicity in Dialogic Argumentation
- Publisher: Masaryk University Press
- Language: Czech, English, Slovak
- Publication year: 2019
- Department: Faculty of Arts